Am doing some rudder maintenance and replacing sloppy plastic gudgeons. Had a search round the old threads on rudders/set up and found this anomaly:
http://www.laserinternational.org/rules/measdiag.htm
In my book, the 78 degrees refers to the bisected angle between the top leading edge of the rudder assembly and the leading edge of the foil of the rudder. (the bit that’s actually in the water.) Sure my book is old, but no other measurement has changed (only tolerances on mast distances has reduced from +/- 12mm to +/- 5mm.) Perhaps a pic will explain better:
You can see that 0 degrees is not the bottom edge of the rudder cheeks.
As it is, the top trailing edge of my rudder is not parallel with the trailing edge of the alloy cheeks. I read in an old thread that this is a giveaway that the rudder is swept too far back, contributing - perhaps not greatly - to weather helm. But there was no general agreement on this forum that a guy could file a bit out of the rudder and swing it forward. Posters have muttered warnings about measurers etc...
Was this rule purposely changed or is the new drawing inaccurate and the error carried through – causing the measuring debate (if any)?
My rudder is ten years old and made in Australia. It's some kind of molded reinforced plastic. The boat and equipment was used in an international regatta around 2005, and to my knowledge has remained unadjusted.
http://www.laserinternational.org/rules/measdiag.htm
In my book, the 78 degrees refers to the bisected angle between the top leading edge of the rudder assembly and the leading edge of the foil of the rudder. (the bit that’s actually in the water.) Sure my book is old, but no other measurement has changed (only tolerances on mast distances has reduced from +/- 12mm to +/- 5mm.) Perhaps a pic will explain better:
You can see that 0 degrees is not the bottom edge of the rudder cheeks.
As it is, the top trailing edge of my rudder is not parallel with the trailing edge of the alloy cheeks. I read in an old thread that this is a giveaway that the rudder is swept too far back, contributing - perhaps not greatly - to weather helm. But there was no general agreement on this forum that a guy could file a bit out of the rudder and swing it forward. Posters have muttered warnings about measurers etc...
Was this rule purposely changed or is the new drawing inaccurate and the error carried through – causing the measuring debate (if any)?
My rudder is ten years old and made in Australia. It's some kind of molded reinforced plastic. The boat and equipment was used in an international regatta around 2005, and to my knowledge has remained unadjusted.